The case of Habib, a man from Lahore accused of blasphemy while living abroad, has raised significant public and religious concerns in Pakistan. Yet, despite the intense emotions surrounding the case, political parties across the country have remained unusually silent. With blasphemy being one of the most sensitive issues in Pakistan, why are major political parties hesitating to take a clear stance on the matter?
Experts suggest that political calculations, fear of backlash from religious groups, and internal divisions are contributing to this silence. As Habib’s case continues to capture headlines, the absence of political commentary raises important questions about how religious issues intersect with Pakistani politics.
—
Fear of Religious Backlash and Extremist Influence
In Pakistan, blasphemy allegations are not only legal matters; they are deeply political. Any politician who publicly opposes or calls for leniency in such cases risks alienating religious voters and provoking backlash from Islamic parties and extremist groups.
Political analysts argue that Pakistan’s political parties are reluctant to voice opinions on Habib’s case due to the polarizing nature of blasphemy laws. Religious groups, which hold considerable sway in Pakistan, often demand swift and severe action against anyone accused of blasphemy. For political parties, aligning with these groups is seen as a way to maintain voter support, especially among conservative constituencies.
“Blasphemy is an emotional issue, and political parties don’t want to take the risk of angering religious voters. It’s safer for them to stay quiet, especially when the accused is someone like Habib,” says Adeel Rehman, a political analyst and expert in Pakistani electoral strategies.
—
Politicization of Blasphemy: A Double-Edged Sword
Blasphemy laws have long been a tool for political mobilization in Pakistan. In the past, both mainstream political parties and Islamic parties have used blasphemy-related issues to rally support among religious voters. However, with the rise of religious extremism and more hardline factions in politics, the matter has become increasingly volatile.
Habib’s case, which involves an accused individual living abroad, presents a unique challenge. The public’s emotional response to the case is unpredictable, and politicians are wary of taking sides without inciting either a religious uproar or international criticism.
“In Pakistan, any political leader who speaks out on such sensitive issues runs the risk of being labeled as either too liberal or too conservative. For that reason, silence is often the safest option,” explains Aftab Ahmed Shaikh, a senior leader of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM).
—
Internal Divisions Within Political Parties
In addition to external pressure, many political parties face internal divisions over the issue of blasphemy. While some members may advocate for a hardline stance to align with religious groups, others may push for reform or moderation, citing human rights concerns or international pressures.
These internal disagreements often lead to political paralysis, where parties avoid making strong statements on controversial topics like blasphemy. As a result, the leadership remains silent, preferring to focus on issues that are less divisive or easier to navigate.
“There is a lack of consensus within the political leadership on how to approach religiously charged issues. Parties are afraid of fracturing their voter base, so they avoid commenting on the issue entirely,” said Aftab Ahmed Shaikh, a senior member of MQM.
—
International Pressure and Diplomatic Concerns
Pakistan’s blasphemy laws are frequently criticized by international human rights organizations, which view them as violations of freedom of speech and human rights. This has put political parties in a difficult position, especially given that Habib’s case has received attention outside Pakistan.
If political leaders speak out in favor of the blasphemy laws, they risk alienating Western allies and human rights groups. On the other hand, if they call for reform or repeal of these laws, they risk losing support from conservative voters and religious organizations.
The political silence on Habib’s case may, therefore, be rooted in a desire to avoid diplomatic tensions. By staying quiet, politicians are able to balance the delicate relationship between religious sensibilities at home and international expectations.
—
Electoral Calculations: Playing it Safe
At its core, political silence on sensitive issues like blasphemy is often a matter of electoral strategy. Political parties in Pakistan have historically prioritized vote banks over moral or ideological stances. As Habib’s case involves an issue so closely tied to religion, which remains a deeply influential force in Pakistani politics, parties are reluctant to risk losing support from their religiously conservative electorate.
“In an election year, political parties will often remain quiet on issues that could split their voter base. With blasphemy, it’s a high-risk issue for politicians. Habib’s case has sparked a nationwide debate, but parties are staying out of it to avoid losing votes,” says Sohail Qureshi, a senior analyst at The Political Insight Group.
—
Conclusion: The Politics of Silence
The silence of Pakistan’s political parties on Habib’s blasphemy case underscores the complex intersection of religion, politics, and public sentiment in the country. Political expediency—rooted in fear of backlash, internal divisions, and international concerns—has resulted in a muted response from nearly all political leaders.
As the case continues to unfold, the question remains: Will political parties continue to avoid taking a stand, or will they finally address this highly sensitive issue head-on? Until then, Habib’s case serves as a reminder of the delicate balance politicians must strike in Pakistan’s deeply religious and politically charged environment.
